The screen's +44.8pp valuation margin does not survive the filings. 76.8% of MannKind's FY2022-FY2025 revenue increase came from one counterparty (United Therapeutics, via a 10% Tyvaso DPI royalty and a cost-plus manufacturing contract) and a further 9.3% came from the scPharmaceuticals acquisition closed 7 October 2025; organic own-product revenue contributed 13.9%. Strip the acquisition and Q1 2026 revenue FELL 4.7% year-on-year. The screen also records +$57.4m of net cash against a filed position of $325.0m of principal borrowings versus $133.9m of cash and investments — a $246.5m error. Correcting both moves the required 5-year CAGR from 7.0% to 11.8% and the demonstrated rate from 51.8% to organic TTM +8.2%, turning the margin from +44.8pp to −3.6pp.
How to read this
This is an analysis, not a position. The memo scores every Criteria and blocks on none of them. Whether an analysis justifies a position is a question about a particular book — so this page carries no Long, Short, Watchlist or Avoid verdict.
Every Criteria returns PASS / FAIL / INDETERMINATE and carries a type. BINDING criteria are admission tests for a long-only absolute-return strategy. MEASURED criteria are always scored and never block. A missing input is INDETERMINATE, never FAIL.
Two valuation outputs, two horizons. The implied-path test (reverse DCF) asks what today's price requires over five years and whether the business has demonstrated it. The 12-month target asks what the name is likely to trade at, on near-term revenue and the name's own multiple history. Sensitivity runs over the exit multiple, never over scenario probabilities.
Every figure on this page was verified against primary SEC filings. Where the Tier-1 screen and the filings disagree, both numbers are shown and the source of the correction is named.
Key findings
- 76.8% of the FY2022–FY2025 revenue increase is United Therapeutics (45.2% royalty + 31.6% cost-plus manufacturing); a further 9.3% is the scPharmaceuticals acquisition; organic own-product revenue contributed 13.9%.
- Strip the acquisition and Q1 2026 revenue FELL 4.7% year-on-year ($74.7m vs $78.4m). Organic TTM growth is +8.2%, not 51.8%.
- The screen's net cash of +$57.4m is wrong by $246.5m. The 10-Q states $133.9m of cash and investments against $325.0m of principal borrowings — $189.1m of NET DEBT. MannKind has had negative book equity for 21 consecutive quarters.
- Correcting the balance sheet and share count moves the required 5-year CAGR from 7.0% to 11.8%. The +44.8pp margin becomes −3.6pp.
- The screen's operating margin of 11.1% is the FY2025 figure applied to TTM revenue. TTM operating margin is 4.1%, so EV/EBIT is 97.0x, not 28.7x.
- The bear case is in MannKind's own 10-K: United Therapeutics called Tresmi — a soft-mist treprostinil MannKind earns nothing on — a 'category killer' versus dry-powder inhalers, with a 2026 filing and 2027 launch planned.
- Tyvaso DPI mentions in MannKind's own earnings releases collapsed from 11-12 to 3-4 and have stayed there for six consecutive quarters, while the line grew to 64% of revenue. 'Tresmi' appears zero times in any earnings release.
- Five days before the screen ran, MannKind issued 12.85m shares (4.2%) at a 0.6% DISCOUNT to market to raise $50m — to fund a $45m CVR bill triggered by its own Furoscix ReadyFlow approval. Net new capital to the business: about $2m.
- $25.3m of TTM revenue (7.0%) is non-cash or pass-through: $13.1m remitted to Sagard and ~$12.2m of deferred-revenue amortisation.
- The revenue is NOT milestone-driven — identifiable milestone revenue is $1.0m of $349.0m in FY2025. The problem is not lumpiness; it is that the recurring revenue is somebody else's.
- Furoscix is real: ~+70% year-on-year underlying, with ReadyFlow FDA-approved 23 July 2026 de-risking $129.6m of capitalised IPR&D. But it is 11% of revenue and would have to grow roughly 5x by FY2031 to justify the price with the UT block merely flat.
- Watch item: Furoscix ran at $273k/day in the Q4 2025 stub and $172k/day in Q1 2026 — a 37% per-day sequential decline in the first full quarter of ownership.
Sections
Disclosed limitations
- No analyst consensus — Alpha Vantage quota exhausted 2026-07-29. The NTM revenue base of $410m is a HOUSE build from disclosed run rates, not consensus, and is labelled as such throughout.
- The expiry date of the underlying 10% United Therapeutics royalty is NOT DISCLOSED in either the FY2025 10-K or the Q1 2026 10-Q. Only the Sagard 1% term (to 31 Dec 2042) is disclosed. Noted as a gap, not assumed.
- No Q2 2026 financials. The last filed balance sheet is 31 March 2026. All pro-forma figures layer only the July placement and the $45m CVR payment onto it and therefore EXCLUDE Q2 2026 operating burn, which is unknown.
- The Q2 2026 earnings date is PATTERN-INFERRED from filings on 2025-08-06, 2024-08-07 and 2023-08-07. It is not company-confirmed and no date is asserted.
- The ~$16m CVR fair-value remeasurement charge is DERIVED (contingent consideration carried at $29.0m against a now-triggered $45.0m obligation), not company-disclosed.
- Afrezza / V-Go / Furoscix TTM splits are reconstructed from MD&A gross revenue, gross-to-net percentages and stated dollar changes, then cross-checked to sum to the tagged Commercial product sales total. They carry about ±$1m of rounding.
- The 22.6x EBIT exit multiple is the SCREEN'S and its GROWTH_MATCHED basis over 130 peers is NOT verified here. This memo declares the EBIT-basis exit multiple UNIDENTIFIED and anchors on MannKind's own EV/Sales history instead.
- Momentum percentile is INDETERMINATE — no cross-sectional universe distribution was computed, and criteria.md requires momentum be assessed cross-sectionally.
- Peer Spread Criteria is INDETERMINATE — no comparable name in the same end-market was underwritten in this run.
- No external professional 12-month target exists for the sanity band. That check is not performed and is declared missing rather than substituted with a peer-derived figure.
- No Excel workbook and no forward DCF were built. Per criteria.md the reverse DCF is mandatory as the primary output where terminal value dominates, which it does entirely here (TTM EBIT $14.8m against a $1,440m EV). Every derived number is fully specified in MNKD_Financial_Model_Notes.md.
- Alpaca IEX vs SIP: all price, volume and volatility figures use SIP. The IEX feed returns about 5% of true volume for this name (202k vs 4.08m shares/day median) and would understate liquidity roughly 20-fold.